XRP v. SEC: Judgment Day Approaches for all of Crypto

Say what you want about the XRP Army, if you own crypto, you should be pulling for XRP’s army of lawyers. The SEC v. Ripple Labs has been dragging on since December of 2020. In a surprising motion filed last week, Ripple Labs (creators of XRP) has asked for summary judgment of their case. In other words, no trial, no jury. Instead, one judge will weigh the Ripple written argument vs. the SEC’s written argument. At stake is MUCH MORE than the fate of XRP’s token price. Summary judgment day will decide if ALL cryptocurrencies are classified as assets or securities in the US. 

The distinction between an asset and a security has major regulatory implications. Securities are regulated by the SEC; the reporting and auditing bar for securities is very high. Exchanges that are authorized to operate in the US will have to go through many more hurdles to offer securities to their customers. In contrast, cryptocurrencies have been treated like assets since 2009 in the US. Assets are under the regulatory umbrella of the Fed and are much more loosely controlled. 

Ripple has made a valiant argument that classifying XRP as a security is totally against legal precedent. In their written arguments, Ripple’s lawyers tear apart the SEC’s loose interpretation of the law: precedent demonstrates all laws must be interpreted according to the definitions used at the time laws were written. This is why Ripple’s legal brief has an exhaustive discussion of “investment contracts.” The SEC contends Ripple’s employees made these contracts when they publicly shared optimism for XRP’s price action. Thus, the SEC claims XRP is a security because of this verbal “investment contract.”

Team Ripple coolly shreds this argument to pieces. Going all the way back to the 1920s, in every case where “investment contracts” are mentioned, there is a literal physical contract that has been signed by both parties within the trial. This is a major discovery. Beyond the existence of a physical document, there are important clauses that must be considered. In the precedent-setting contracts, sellers explicitly promise that their efforts will deliver value to the buyers. Nothing like these explicit, written promises exist in SEC v. Ripple Labs. Therefore, the actual letter of the law is clearly in Ripple’s favor. 

Writer and Redlion's editor-in-chief. Musician, 🥁 streamed over 100,000,000 times playing for Caught A Ghost, Magic Bronson and more. 2017 Experian hack victim... made the benefits of web3 easy to understand. Listening is his superpower.

TURN ON SOUND
Latest ISSUE

124

Week 4 2023

MoonBirdHouse Robbery🦉

This week’s “crow to pluck” is the theft of NFTs out of several high-profile wallets—most recently, Moonbirds’ Kevin Rose was victimized. How can anyone keep their NFTs safe?

25.00 USD

Open Edition

Style:
Illustration
Color icon
Colors:
Full
Issue Number:
Stylized
Music:
Yes
SoundFX:
Yes
ETH Sign:
Yes

Did you enjoy this article?

Subscribe to Redlion Gazette

Gazette time units are weeks so our subscriptions follow that pattern. You are always getting your Gazette & ArtDrop plus saving 30% of the minting price! There are 2 tiers of subscription.

        Never miss a thing!

        Find your weekly guilty pleasure in a mailbox.